Rocksteady dissects Batman: Arkham City's controversial ending
“There were no dissenting voices, as long 𒅌as it was done in a ꦬproper way,” recalls Sefton Hill
Obviously this story about the end of Arkham City contains SPOILERS! You have been warned!
The final moments of Batman: Arkham City saw the (supposed) demise of 𓆏the franchise's greatest villain, Joker. But more than just a cheesy “shock” moment to get fans talking, Rocksteady recently told CVG it had Joker's fate sealed from the beginning and, for them, there was really no better way to complete the story.
“There were no dissenting voices, as long as it was done in a proper way, as long as it was clear that Batman didn't go out to kill him - that's never what Batman would do,” Hill explained, recalling early conversations with DC Comics, Warner Bros. and Rocksteady developers. “Joker being responsible for his own downfall because he wasn't able to resist stabbing Batman in the back was something we thought would be a nice poetic end for him♒."
Sign up to the GamesRadar+ Newsletter
Weekly digests, 🌟tales from the communit💜ies you love, and more
Matt Bradford wrote new🎉s and features here at GamesRadar+ until 2016. Since then he's gone on to work with the Guinness World Records, acting as writer and researcher for the annual Gamer's Edition series of books, and has worked as an editor, technical writer, and voice actor. Matt is now a freelance journalist and editor, generating copy across a multitude of industries.